LG Optimus G Pro E980 AT&T 4G LTE SmartPhone Review
Benchmarks
| LG Optimus G Pro | LG Optimus G | Galaxy S3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quadrant 2.1.1 | 9328 | 7803 | 3,776 |
| AnTuTu v3.4 | 19939 | 18752 | 8,811 |
| AnTuTu Battery Test v3.4 | 462 | – | – |
| SunSpider 1.0 (ms) | 1281 | 1115 | 2,330 |
| Peacekeeper | 572 | 603 | 317 |
| Browsermark 2.0 | 2225 | 2809 | 2,094 |
| 3DMark Ice Storm | 9287 | 7759 | 3559 |
|
SunSpider: lower scores are better. Higher is better on all other benchmarks. |
|||
The LG Optimus G Pro was doing a great job in our CPU benchmarks when compared to the Samsung Galaxy S3 and the LG Optimus G. In Quadrant 2.1.1 the Optimus G Pro scored 9328, 1525 points faster the the Optimus G and 5552 points faster than the Samsung S3! In AnTuTu the Pro scored 19939 which is faster than the LG Optimus G score of 19752, and worlds faster than the 8811 scored by the Galaxy S3! The LG Optimus G Pro didn’t fare as well as I had hoped in the browser tests like the SunSpider 1.0. In SunSpider the LG Optimus G was slightly faster with a time of 1115ms while the Optimus G Pro scored 1281ms. The same pattern emerged for Peacekeeper, and Browsermark 2.0. 3DMark Ice Storm was in favor of the LG Optimus G Pro once again though. The Optimus G Pro scored 9287, the Optimus G scored 7759, and the Samsung Galaxy S3 scored 3559.
Comments are closed.